Stop Bloating Token Costs by Stuffing Agent History Into Every Prompt
Production agent apps quickly discover the same trap: stuffing conversation history into every prompt drives token cost and latency up faster than usage. MemoryLake retrieves a compact memory block scoped to the current task — same recall, fraction of the tokens.
Stop Bloating Token Costs by Stuffing Agent History Into Every Prompt
Get Started FreeFree forever · No credit card required
The problem: token cost scales with stuffed history
A user with three months of agent history has 200K tokens of context. Stuffing it into every call inflates inference cost and latency on every turn. Switching to summary memory loses fidelity. The right answer is structured retrieval, not stuffing or summarization.
How MemoryLake reduces token bloat
Token-budgeted retrieval
Pull only the memory relevant to the current task, sized to your budget.
Typed memory beats flat history
Retrieve facts, events, or skills — not raw transcripts.
10,000x scale over stuffing
Compress millions of tokens of history into millisecond retrievals.
Prompt caching compatible
Retrieved blocks slot into cacheable system messages.
Free forever · No credit card required
How it works for token-efficient agent memory
- Connect — Replace history stuffing with MemoryLake retrieval at prompt construction.
- Structure — Per-turn writes to typed memory.
- Reuse — Retrieve a token-budgeted memory block per prompt.
Before vs. after: token usage
| Stuffed history | MemoryLake retrieval | |
|---|---|---|
| Token cost per long-history call | 30K+ | <2K |
| Latency from giant prompt | Slow first token | Fast |
| Memory of months-old context | Truncated or summarized | Retrievable |
| Prompt cache hit rate | Drops | Maintained |
Who this is for
Engineering teams running production agent apps where token costs are scaling faster than user count — and switching to summary memory has been considered but rejected for quality reasons.
Related use cases
Frequently asked questions
Does retrieval miss important context?
Does retrieval miss important context?
LoCoMo benchmark #1 at 94.03% accuracy on long-horizon recall — top-ranked structured retrieval.
Cost comparison?
Cost comparison?
Typically 10-100x cost reduction at long-history scale.
Self-host?
Self-host?
Yes — enterprise tier deploys in your VPC.